Legal Opinion
LaChapelle v. Union Pacific Coal Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 1923No. 1122PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kimball, Justice.
The plaintiff in error is the administratrix of the estate of Peter Fomakis, deceased. Her right, if any, arises from the following facts. On June 1, 1921, the intestate, while employed by defendant in error as a miner of coal, suffered an injury which resulted in permanent total disability, for *456which he became entitled to receive compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Secs. 4315-4348, C. S. 1920, as amended by Ch. 138, Laws 1921.) His claim to compensation was not questioned and was allowed by an order of award made January 3, 1922. This award included an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bartoni's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Murphy's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Lahoma Oil Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Ray v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Claim of Wozneak v. Buffalo Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bassett v. Stratford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Sorenson v. Six Companies, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Parker v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Heuchert v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- W. A. Woodard Lumber Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.