Legal Opinion

Cronin v. Coyle

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1935No. Civ. 9673PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff in this action secured judgment against defendants for the sum of $3,062, as damages for injuries sustained by her as a result of the negligent operation of a taxicab in which she was a passenger and being transported over a street in the city of Los Angeles. Defendant Mercer Casualty Company alone appeals from the judgment, and also attempts to appeal from an order denying a motion for new trial.

In a rather formidable and voluminous opening brief appellant states six questions as those involved in the appeal, and specifies as error (1) the admission and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frasch v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Bank of Anderson v. Home InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chicago Title Insurance v. AMZ Insurance Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Troost v. Estate of DeBoerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Shultz Steel Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Apparel Manufacturers' Supply Co. v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Guipre v. Kurt Hitke & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API