Cronin v. Coyle
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIS, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff in this action secured judgment against defendants for the sum of $3,062, as damages for injuries sustained by her as a result of the negligent operation of a taxicab in which she was a passenger and being transported over a street in the city of Los Angeles. Defendant Mercer Casualty Company alone appeals from the judgment, and also attempts to appeal from an order denying a motion for new trial.
In a rather formidable and voluminous opening brief appellant states six questions as those involved in the appeal, and specifies as error (1) the admission and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Frasch v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Bank of Anderson v. Home InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chicago Title Insurance v. AMZ Insurance Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Troost v. Estate of DeBoerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Shultz Steel Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Apparel Manufacturers' Supply Co. v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Guipre v. Kurt Hitke & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.