Legal Opinion
Proctor v. Metropolitan Money Store Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 29, 2008No. RWT 07cv1957PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROGER W. TITUS, District Judge.
Foreclosure is a terrifying prospect for any homeowner. Having fallen behind on mortgage payments and unable to make ends meet, fearful homeowners facing foreclosure are desperate to keep their homes but uncertain where to turn for help. As the rate of foreclosures has increased — reaching crisis proportions in recent months — so have instances of scam artists seeking to take advantage of these vulnerable homeowners. 1 Offering to stop foreclosures and allow owners to remain in their homes, the “foreclosure rescue scam” provides what seems like…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Proctor v. Metropolitan Money Store Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Haley v. CorcoranDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Norman v. BorisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Sterling v. Ourisman Chevrolet of Bowie Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Tower Oaks Boulevard, LLC v. ProcidaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.