Legal Opinion

Slutzker v. Rieber

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 19, 1942No. Docket 149/37PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complainant, a stockholder of Barber Asphalt Corporation, a New Jersey corporation, instituted this cause in his own behalf and in behalf of all other stockholders of the corporation who may desire to co-operate and unite in its prosecution. The bill charges (paragraph 12) that the individual defendants who have served as directors of the company, "unmindful of their duty as the managers of the defendant company's business and as fiduciaries with respect to the stockholders of said company and indifferent to the rights and interests of said stockholders, have negligently and fraudulently…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ellerman v. Chicago Junction Railways & Union Stockyards Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1891
  2. Appleton v. American Malting Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  3. Solimine v. HollanderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
  4. Groel v. United Electric Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
  5. Mayer v. Oxidation Products Co., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Saigh Ex Rel. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. BuschMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Bookman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API