Legal Opinion

Solimine v. Hollander

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 1, 1941No. Docket 129/38PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Are corporate directors entitled to indemnification or reimbursement from the corporation for their reasonable expenses necessarily incurred by them in defending a stockholder's derivative suit in which an accounting was sought against them because of alleged dereliction of duty and in which suit they were vindicated? This question arises because of an application on notice made by counsel for the defendant Herman A. Fenning, subsequently joined in by counsel for the other individual defendants, for an order reserving to the defendants the right to apply for counsel fees against the corporate…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jessup v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. New v. . NicollNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. In Re the Accounting of OrdwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Solimine v. HollanderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  5. Figge v. BergenthalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Highway Truck Drivers and Helpers Local 107 v. CohenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Swenson v. ThibautCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Maldonado v. FlynnCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1980
  4. Mooney v. Willys-Overland Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  5. Bishop v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API