Mayer v. Oxidation Products Co., Inc.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Bigelow, V. C.
Complainant is a stockholder of the Oxidation Products 'Company and the Industrial Oxidation Corporation, both incorporated in Delaware. The two companies have the same stockholders, directors and officers, and are operated as a single enterprise. Complainant alleges that three of the-stockholders, namely, Fischer, Bibb and Yan Pelt, have received large sums belonging to the corporations and he asks-an accounting and restoration to the companies. Similarly, he asserts that moneys of the companies have been improperly paid to a third corporation, Grant Manufacturing Company,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Trustees of Dartmouth College v. WoodwardSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Guthrie v. HarknessSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Babcock v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Burnrite Coal Briquette Co. v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Richland v. CrandallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Weede v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co. of DelawareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Bookman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
- Leeds v. HarrisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Slutzker v. RieberNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.