Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Oxidation Products Co., Inc.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 5, 1932PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bigelow, V. C.

Complainant is a stockholder of the Oxidation Products 'Company and the Industrial Oxidation Corporation, both incorporated in Delaware. The two companies have the same stockholders, directors and officers, and are operated as a single enterprise. Complainant alleges that three of the-stockholders, namely, Fischer, Bibb and Yan Pelt, have received large sums belonging to the corporations and he asks-an accounting and restoration to the companies. Similarly, he asserts that moneys of the companies have been improperly paid to a third corporation, Grant Manufacturing Company,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Trustees of Dartmouth College v. WoodwardSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Guthrie v. HarknessSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Babcock v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Burnrite Coal Briquette Co. v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Richland v. CrandallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  2. State Ex Rel. Weede v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co. of DelawareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. Bookman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
  4. Leeds v. HarrisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  5. Slutzker v. RieberNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API