Legal Opinion
Minton v. Mitchell
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 21, 1928No. Docket No. 6225PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendants. The ease was tried by the court without a jury. Defendants’ motion for a new trial was denied.
The facts follow: J. Ed. Mitchell during his lifetime had entered into a contract of purchase wherein he agreed to buy from Marin Lumber and Supply Co. a certain tract of land known as Duncans Mill property in Sonoma County, consisting of about 3,500 acres of timber land, sawmill, store, cottages, and personal property used in connection therewith. Upon the death of J. Ed. Mitchell the defendants W. D.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Hamilton v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Gray v. BekinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Parsons v. AmbosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Chesapeake Industries, Inc. v. Togova Entreprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- DIAL 800 v. FesbinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Overholtzer v. Northern Counties Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- In Re DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Ramonas v. KerelisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.