Legal Opinion

Miller v. Aiken

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 2, 2005No. 25976PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE BURNETT:

Pursuant to Rule 228, SCACR, we accepted the following questions on certification from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina:

I. Is an automobile insurer which provides only non-liability “collision and other named perils” coverage an “automobile insurance carrier” under S.C. Code Ann. § 38-77-160 (2002), and thus required to offer underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage?

II. If such an insurer is required to make an offer of UIM coverage, and no such offer was made, does the UIM coverage imposed by South Carolina law extend to the limits of a separate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Clark v. CantrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Kiriakides v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Mid-State Auto Auction of Lexington, Inc. v. AltmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bass v. IsochemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. SweatCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Howell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Edwards v. State Law Enforcement DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API