Legal Opinion

Howell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 16, 2006No. 26213PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice BURNETT:

We accepted three questions certified by the United States District Court for South Carolina pursuant to Rule 228, SCACR. The questions involve the applicability of S.C.Code Ann. § 38-77-160 (2002) to an insurance policy providing liability coverage for only hired and non-owned vehicles used in the named insured’s business.

FACTUALIPROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The facts are drawn from the district court’s certification order. On June 2, 2002, Timothy Ross Howell (Plaintiff) was involved in an automobile accident while driving an automobile owned by his father. Plaintiff was acting in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Mid-State Auto Auction of Lexington, Inc. v. AltmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Joiner Ex Rel. Rivas v. RivasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Osprey, Inc. v. Cabana Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Original Blue Ribbon Taxi Corp. v. South Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Colleton Preparatory Academy, Inc. v. Hoover Universal, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Nakatsu v. Encompass Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Carter v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  5. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API