Legal Opinion
Malka L. Fishman v. Subway Franchisee Advertising Fund Trust, Ltd.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided April 6, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02444Unknown
1Opinion
1 O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 MALKA FISHMAN, Case No. 2:19-cv-02444-ODW (ASx) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION FOR INTERLOCUTORY 14 SUBWAY FRANCHISEE APPEAL AND TO STAY ADVERTISING FUND TRUST, LTD., PROCEEDINGS [41] 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Defendant Subway Franchisee Advertising Fund Trust (“Subway”) moves for an 19 order to certify an interlocutory appeal and stay proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). 20 (Mot. for Interlocutory Appeal and to Stay Proceedings (“Mot.”) 1, ECF No. 41.) For 21 the reasons…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Reese v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- James R. Ahrenholz, Plaintiff-Appellee/respondent v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Defendant-Appellant/petitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Tom L. Ashlock v. Conseco Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Couch v. Telescope Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.