Legal Opinion
Rural Water Dist. No. 4 v. City of Eudora, Kan.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 9, 2009No. Case 07-2463-JARPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JULIE A. ROBINSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Rural Water District No. 4, Douglas County, Kansas (“Rural”), filed this Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that it is protected under 7 U.S.C. § 1926(b), which gives it the right to provide water service to its service area. Rural claims that defendant City of Eudora (“City”) violated § 1926 by annexing certain properties within its service area and proceeding to enforce the provisions of K.S.A. § 12-527, allowing the City to purchase Rural’s assets. Rural seeks damages, a declaratory judgment, and an injunction. The…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rural Water Sewer & Solid Waste Management, District No. 1 v. City of GuthrieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Iredell Water Corporation v. City of StatesvilleDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022
- Milcrofton Utility District of Williamson County, Tennessee v. City of Brentwood, TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020