Legal Opinion

Clark v. Maxwell

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1895No. 1,507PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Steuben Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Ross, C. J. —

The appellee brought this action in the DeKalb Circuit Court against the appellant to recover a balance due upon a contract and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The venue of the cause was changed to the Steuben Circuit Court, where a trial was had, resulting in a finding and judgment for appellee.

The sufficiency of the complaint, which is in three paragraphs, is challenged for the first time by an assign, ment in this court.

The rule by which the sufficiency of the facts alleged to constitute a cause of action is tested, when first challenged by assignment in this court is entirely…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burkhart v. GladishIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Lawton v. CaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Adams v. BuhlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Milhollin v. FullerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co. v. StanleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Littler v. RobinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Lockhart v. SchlotterbackIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Advance Manufacturing Co. v. AuchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. WaltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API