Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. Schlotterback

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1895No. 1,734PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Prom the Noble Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, J. —

This action was brought by the appellants against appellee.

*684It is alleged, in the complaint, that Arthur D. Lock-hart, in 1873, recovered a judgment in the Noble Circuit Court, for $655.89, against appellee; that said judgment remains wholly due and unpaid; that in 1877 said Lock-hart departed this life intestate, in California, leaving surviving him as his sole and only heirs at law the appellants — his widow and his mother — and that they aré entitled to the money due and unpaid on said judgment.

There was a trial by jury and a verdict returned in favor of appellants for $1,442.95.

T…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Du Souchet v. DutcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Holzman v. HibbenIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Williams v. RileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Eberhart v. ReisterIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Western Assurance Co. v. KoontzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. South Shore Gas & Electric Co. v. AmbreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. City of LaFayette v. WestIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Plano Manufacturing Co. v. KeslerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Dotson v. DotsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API