Legal Opinion

Hart v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2002No. 01-247PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[¶ 1] Robert A. Hart (Hart) entered a conditional plea of nolo contendere to one count of taking indecent liberties with a minor, reserving his right to appeal the district court’s pretrial ruling on the admissibility under W.R.E. 404(b) of certain uncharged misconduct evidence. We affirm.

ISSUE

[¶ 2] The single issue before this Court is the propriety of the district court’s ruling that certain uncharged misconduct evidence would be admissible at trial.

FACTS

[¶ 3] On November 14, 2000, a sixteen-year-old girl (hereinafter C.B.) reported to the Moorcroft police that during a car…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. United States v. Marvin Leo BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. People v. DouglasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Heuring v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  5. Gleason v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Winters v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Swett v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Bhutto v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Lindsay v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Williams v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API