Legal Opinion

Rogers v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1923No. 14625PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. The 1st special ground of the motion for a new trial is based upon the fact that counsel for the defendant stated in his place as an attorney that he had a sore throat and a headache. “ Under the ease of Rawlins v. State, 124 Ga. 31 (19), 39 (52 S. E. 1), followed by Rowland v. State and Carter v. Pitts, 125 &a. 792 (54 S. E. 694, 695), it was for the judge to say whether the physical condition of counsel was such that the case should have been continued; and as he did not think the indisposition was such as to require a continuance, we will not control his discretion.” Lambert Hoisting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rawlins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Lindsay v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Hart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  5. Lambert Hoisting Engine Co. v. Bray & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Middleton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API