Legal Opinion

Middleton v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 15, 1929No. 19645PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. A motion to continue a case, based upon the illness of leading counsel, is addressed to the sound discretion of the court; and where such counsel is present and personally makes the motion, the court may consider “his physical appearance and the mental and physical vigor displayed in making the motion, in determining whether the ends of justice require a continuance of the case.” Dale v. Beasley, 141 Ga. 594 (81 S. E. 849) ; Rogers v. State, 30 Ga. App. 636 (118 S. E. 757) , and cit. Under this ruling and the facts of the instant case, the refusal to continue the case was not error.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dale v. BeasleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  2. Rogers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API