Legal Opinion

Arques v. Wasson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1877No. 4333PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Twentieth Judicial District, County of Monterey. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Crockett, J.:

The action is replevin to recover from the sheriff certain grain and flax seed seized and sold by him under an attachment and execution against one Hansen. The findings show that Hansen leased from the plaintiffs a parcel of land, and from one Heed an adjoining parcel, of both of which ho was in possession under the leases; that to secure the rent to be paid to the jflaintiffs, and also a store account which he owed them, he duly executed and delivered to them a mortgage (which was duly recorded), upon all the crops of every kind to be produced on said lands during…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Van Hoozer v. CoryNew York Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Conderman v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Western Oil & Refining Co. v. Venago Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Cutting Packing Co. v. Packers' ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Grand Forks National Bank v. Minneapolis & Northern Elevator Co.Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1889
  4. Mayer & Co. v. Taylor & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  5. Cottle v. SpitzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API