Hill v. Wilmington Chemical Corporation
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from an order denying third-party plaintiff’s motion for amended findings or, in the alternative, for a new trial; and third-party plaintiff’s motion for a new trial as to third-party defendant E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company on the ground of newly discovered evidence.
For a few years, Joseph S. Klehman had been engaged in selling a silicone-base water repellent as salesman and sales manager for companies which manufactured such products. While so engaged he decided to go into business for himself. He learned that E. I. du Pont de Nemours and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ford Motor v. WagonerTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
3Cited by34 opinions
- First National Bank Ex Rel. Huckleby v. Nor-Am Agricultural Products, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Frey v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Gray v. Badger Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re TMJ Implants Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
- Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1998
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.