Legal Opinion

McCargar v. H. G. Bittleston Law & Collection Agency

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1925No. Docket No. 5309PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

This is a suit in equity to annul a judgment obtained by H. G. Bittleston Law and Collection Agency, a corporation, defendant herein, against C. W. McCargar, plaintiff herein, in the justice’s court of Los Angeles township, Los Angeles County, for the payment of the sum of $62.02 principal and $5 costs, upon the ground that said judgment was obtained through extrinsic fraud and upon the further ground that the assignment of the claim upon which the action was brought was void as being against public policy. A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained by the court with leave to amend.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Estudillo v. SEC. Loan & Tr. Co. of S. Cal.California Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Collins v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Heller v. Dyerville Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Reed v. Bank of UkiahCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Painter v. J. B. Painter Co.California Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Bettencourt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API