Legal Opinion

Reed v. Bank of Ukiah

California Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1905No. S.F. No. 3502PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Arthur J. Thatcher, J. T. Carey, and John H. Marble, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The plaintiff, individually and as executrix, appeals from an order denying her motion for "a new trial.

The complaint alleges a cause of action in equity to set aside a judgment of the superior court of Sonoma County in favor of the Bank of Ukiah against John S. Reed and Anna M. Reed, rendered on September 18, 1897, during the lifetime of John S. Reed. The grounds alleged are that the judgment sought to be set aside was obtained by means of fraud and undue influence on the part of the officers and agents of the bank, and that the plaintiff, Anna M. Reed, and the deceased John S. Reed had good…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Adams v. HastingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brown v. TrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Chehalis Coal Co. v. LaisureWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Brewer v. DodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Bridges v. ReaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API