Bettencourt v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Plaintiff’s appeal from a judgment of nonsuit based upon his opening statement raises the question of whether his complaint alleged a cause of action for negligence against defendants. *
The Complaint
The complaint primarily charged the State of California and defendants as officers, agents and employees of the state, with maintaining the Dumbarton Bridge in a dangerous and defective condition in failing to provide adequate lighting and warning devices to warn persons driving their vehicles over the bridge of the elevating of the draw. It alleged all of the conditions required to bring the case…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Hayden v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Oppenheimer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Shannon v. FleishhackerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones v. CzapkayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Whaley v. JansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Collenburg v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Armstrong v. City of BelmontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Bartlett v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956