Legal Opinion
Tolbert v. Tolbert
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided August 29, 1930No. 20230PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. A defendant who fails to demur to a petition which is fatally defective, in'that it does not set forth a cause of action, may, “after verdict and judgment against him, in addition to other available remedies, duly move to set the judgment aside.” Jones v. Harris, 151 Ga. 129 (3) (106 S. E. 555); Harbin v. Hunt, 151 Ga. 60 (3) (105 S. E. 842).
2. Under the war-risk insurance act, where the beneficiary dies before receiving all of the installments of the war-risk insurance, the remainder “shall be paid to the estate of the insured” (38 U. S. C. A., § 514; Coleman v. Harrison, 168 Ga. 859, 149…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brown v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- National Union Bank v. McNealSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Coleman v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Harbin v. HuntSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Jones v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Singleton v. CheekSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. BrackinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Kicklighter v. KicklighterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Rollins v. Personal Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Williams v. LinnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.