Legal Opinion

Curry v. Washington National Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 26, 1937No. 26416PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.

1. Since the very definition of a contract of insurance imports the assumption of a risk by the insurer and a payment of a consideration therefor on the part of the insured, if, because of the invalidity thereof, there has been no assumption of risk by the insurer under the contract, the premiums paid should ordinarily be returned to the insured. See Reserve Loan Life Insurance Co. v. Davis, 23 Ga. App. 571 (99 S. E. 42). It is the general rule that where a contract of insurance is void ab initio because of material misrepresentations made by the insured in the application attached to and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Rowland Co. v. Kell Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  3. Seaback v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Wilkins v. National Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  5. Hawthorne v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Golden v. National Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Floyd v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  4. First National Bank v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API