Legal Opinion

Kavanaugh v. I. Oberfelder & Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1893No. 4969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court of Platte county. Tried below before Post, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, 0.

This cause has twice before been in this court. It is reported in 21 Neb., 483, and 29 Neb., 427. The former opinions contain a full statement of the facts. A third trial resulted in a verdict in favor of Oberfelder & Co., the plaintiffs below, for $2,072, and the defendant, thi& time, prosecutes error.

It is claimed that the court erred in giving certain instructions submitting to the jury the question as to whether B. F. Stump or Mrs. Stump was the owner of the goods in controversy. No exceptions were taken to the giving of these instructions, and they are, therefore, not presented…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. I. Oberfelder & Co. v. KavanaughNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hershiser v. W. E. Higman & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  3. I. Oberfelder & Co. v. KavanaughNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Brown v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Banks v. Omaha Barb Wire Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grand Island Banking Co. v. CostelloNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. T. A. Shaw & Co. v. Robinson & Stokes Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API