Hershiser v. W. E. Higman & Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Holt county. Tried below before Norris, J. cited: Preston v. Spaulding, 10 N. E. Rep., 903; Winner v. Hoyt, 28 N. W. Rep., 380; Prout v. Vaughn, 52 Yt., 457; Miners’ Rank App., 57 Pa. St., 199; Richmond v. Mills, 11 S. ~W. Rep., 960; Ronns v. Carter, 22 Neb., 518; Kellogg v. Richardson, 19 Fed. Rep., 70. cited: Grimes v. Farrington, 19 Neb., 45; Ronns v. Carter, 20 Id., 575; Davis v. Scott, 22 Id., 157.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
The defendants in error brought an action in replevin in the district court of Holt county against the plaintiff in error to recover the possession of a stock of merchandise *532which Hershiser, as sheriff, had levied upon, as the property of one L. PI. Boylan, to satisfy five writs of attachment.
L. H. Boylan, on the 17th day of August, 1887, was engaged in the mercantile business at Stuart, Holt county, and being pressed by his creditors he secured twelve of them, the others he failed to secure. Notes were given by Boylan to the following creditors for the amounts named:
Kimberley &…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Winner v. HoytWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Tootle, Hosea & Co. v. ColdwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Carter v. ReweyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Bonns v. CarterNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Davis v. ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sandusky v. FarisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
- Jones v. LoreeNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Guyer v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Kilpatrick-Koch Dry Goods Co. v. BremersNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Smith v. PhelanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.