I. Oberfelder & Co. v. Kavanaugh
Nebraska Supreme Court
Erb,OE to the district court for Platte county. Tried below before Post, J.
1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.
The defendant in error, who was also defendant in the court below, is the sheriff of Platte county. On or about the 7th clay of December, 1884, he had in his hands two certain orders of attachment, issued out of the county court of said county against one B. E. Stump, one in favor of Lederer, Strause & Co. for the sum of $970.86, the other in favor of Roll, Thayer, 'Williams & Co. for the sum of $247.88. These brclers of attachment he levied upon a certain stock of millinery goods, notions, and store fixtures then in a certain storehouse in the city of Columbus, and took and carried the same…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thornburgh v. HandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Mathews v. DensmoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by11 opinions
- W. W. Kendall Boot & Shoe Co. v. BainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
- I. Oberfelder & Co. v. KavanaughNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Horkey v. KendallNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Williams v. EikenberryNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
- Williams v. EikenberryNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.