Legal Opinion

Grand Island Banking Co. v. Costello

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1895No. 6179PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Hall county. Heard below before Harrison, J. The opinion contains a statement of the case. The decree canceling appellant’s mortgage should be set aside. The only lien on the mortgaged property superior to that of appellant is the claim for city and county taxes.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the district court of Hall county. Heard below before Harrison, J. The opinion contains a statement of the case. The decree canceling appellant’s mortgage should be set aside. The only lien on the mortgaged property superior to that of appellant is the claim for city and county taxes. The mortgage is not invali.d on the ground that the security is excessive. [Grimes v. Farrington, 19 Neb., 44; Smith v. Boyer, 35 Neb., 46; Hershiser v. Higman, 31 Neb., 531; Whitney v. Levon, 34 Neb., 443; First Nat. Bank of Denver v. Lowrey, 36 Neb., 291; Thompson v. Richardson Drug Co., 33 Neb.,…

1Opinion of the Court

Ryan, C.

This action was brought on February 11, 1891, in the district court of Hall county by the Grand Island Banking Company against James A. Costello, sheriff of said county, and the firms of Wood, Brown & Co. and Steppacher, Arnold & Co., to restrain the levy of an execution issued *124on a judgment rendered in favor of each of the firms named against Charles A. Wiebe. The property consisting of a stock of dry goods, carpets, clothing, etc., was in the possession of the Grand Island Banking Company by its agent, J. W. Thompson, under a chattel mortgage previously made by Wiebe, the owner…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCallaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Sherwin v. GaghagenNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Jones v. LoreeNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Kilpatrick-Koch Dry Goods Co. v. McPheelyNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  5. William B. Grimes & Co. v. Farrington Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1886

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Union Securities Co. v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Dayton Spice-Mills Co. v. SloanNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Ellery v. CummingArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  4. T. A. Shaw & Co. v. Robinson & Stokes Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Clement, Bane & Co. v. HartzellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API