Legal Opinion
Walling v. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 12, 1944No. 2859PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
The Wage and Hour Administrator brought this suit to enjoin the appellee, Mid-Continent Pipe Line Company, from violating Section 15(a) (1) (2) (5) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 215(a) (1, 2, 5). The appellee denied coverage under the Act, alleging that the employees involved were not engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, and that it was a service establishment under Section 13(a) (2) of the Act, hence exempt from its coverage. Issues were joined and at the conclusion of the evidence, which is not materially in dispute, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Fleming v. A. B. Kirschbaum Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. HargraveCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Hodges Contracting Company and Kenneth B. HodgesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
- Mitchell v. HertzkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Walling v. Rutherford Food CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Walling v. Panther Creek Mines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.