Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Hertzke

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 18, 1956No. 5237PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.

This action was instituted by the Secretary of Labor under Section 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 217, to enjoin appellees from violating the child labor and record keeping provisions of that Act.

The appellees fall into three groups. (1) A. R. Hertzke, Lawrence Hertzke and Luveme Hertzke, doing business as A. R. Hertzke & Sons, at the time of the alleged violations of the Act were growing snap beans upon a ten-acre tract of land near Greeley, Colorado, under contract to supply the matured product to appellee Kuner-Empson Company. (2) Kuner-Empson…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Jose L. Beliz, Cross-Appellees v. W.H. McLeod & Sons Packing Company, Cross-Appellant, Waldo GalanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Griffin and Brand of McAllen Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Hodges Contracting Company and Kenneth B. HodgesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  4. Landry v. Swire Oilfield Services, L.L.C.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
  5. Aimable v. Long & Scott FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API