Scott v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.
Andrew J. Seott appeals his conviction for dealing in a schedule II controlled substance 1 as a Class B felony and possession of chemical reagents or precursors with intent to manufacture 2 as a Class D felony. Seott raises three issues on appeal, which we restate as follows:
I. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying Seott's motion to suppress and allowing the admission of evidence found during the execution of a search warrant on Seott's property.
II. Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to sustain Scott's conviction for possession of chemical…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Goudy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Iddings v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Esquerdo v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Trowbridge v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kelley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Lundquist v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Reemer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Micheau v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Baird v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.