Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 2004No. 65A01-0307-CR-240PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge.

Andrew J. Seott appeals his conviction for dealing in a schedule II controlled substance 1 as a Class B felony and possession of chemical reagents or precursors with intent to manufacture 2 as a Class D felony. Seott raises three issues on appeal, which we restate as follows:

I. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying Seott's motion to suppress and allowing the admission of evidence found during the execution of a search warrant on Seott's property.

II. Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to sustain Scott's conviction for possession of chemical…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Goudy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Iddings v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Esquerdo v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Trowbridge v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kelley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Lundquist v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Reemer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Micheau v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Baird v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API