Legal Opinion
In RE EAST WINDSOR MUN. UTIL. AUTH. v. Shapiro
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 9, 1970PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
57 N.J. 168 (1970)
270 A.2d 410
IN THE MATTER OF EAST WINDSOR MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
LIVSHA SHAPIRO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued September 28, 1970.
Decided November 9, 1970.
Mr. Paul Shepard, a member of the New York Bar and attorney pro hac vice, argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Mr. Daniel J. Lyons, Jr., attorney).
Mr. Irving Friedman argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.
The opinion of the Court was delivered by SCHETTINO, J.
Plaintiff, a duly created public body exercising the power of eminent domain, N.J.S.A. 40:14B-34,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Trenton v. LenznerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- City of Newark v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- State v. PomettiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. v. Wildlife Preserves, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- State v. De MeoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Frantzen v. HowardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Essex Fells v. Kessler Inst.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- State v. Malibu Beach, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- United States Ex Rel. Herring v. FentonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- Essex County Improvement Authority v. RAR Development AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.