Legal Opinion

Frantzen v. Howard

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 13, 1975PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

132 N.J. Super. 226 (1975)

333 A.2d 289

CHELL FRANTZEN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

LESLIE C. HOWARD, BUILDING INSPECTOR AND ZONING OFFICER, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF CHATHAM, NEW JERSEY, MAYOR AND BOROUGH COUNCIL OF CHATHAM, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted February 4, 1975.

Decided February 13, 1975.

Before Judges HALPERN, CRAHAY and ACKERMAN.

Mr. Arnold Miller, attorney for appellant.

Mr. Charles W. Foster, attorney for respondents Board of Adjustment and Leslie Howard.

Messrs. Stickel, Frahn & Stochholm, attorneys for respondents…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kerr v. KerrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. In RE EAST WINDSOR MUN. UTIL. AUTH. v. ShapiroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. Haelig v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF BOUND BROOK BOROUGHNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  4. Butler v. BuenagaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. New Jersey-Philadelphia Presbytery of the Bible Presbyterian Church v. New Jersey State Board of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  2. Delbridge v. Jann Holding CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. Janicky v. Point Bay Fuel, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  4. Golden Estates v. Continental Cas.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  5. Lawrence v. Bauer Publishing & Printing Ltd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API