Peerless Pacific Co. v. Burckhard
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Sheeks, J., entered February 1, 1915, in favor of the plaintiff, in garnishment proceedings, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action involves the question of exemptions.
The material facts may be briefly stated as follows: On May 3, 1913, E. Burckhard was divorced from his then wife by a decree of the superior court for Chehalis county. On June 30, 1913, Burckhard purchased certain lots or tracts of land in Aberdeen, Washington, on contract. On August 25, 1913, and within six months after the divorce decree was entered, Burckhard and Elsie Warwick were married at Westminster, British Columbia. Prior to this marriage, Burckhard had been engaged in the plumbing business in Aberdeen, and on the day following the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McDonald v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis R'y Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Hall & Tyson v. First National Bank of CovingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- In re the Estate of GorkowWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Hayworth v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. FennWashington Supreme Court · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fisch v. MarlerWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Armijo v. WesseliusWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Huard v. McTeighOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Knoll v. KnollWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of KienstraWashington Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.