Legal Opinion

In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of Kienstra

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1929No. C.D. 1178. En BancPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Kienstra, whom, by this proceeding, it was sought to disbar, or otherwise discipline, as an attorney at law, was duly admitted to the bar of this state, as an attorney at law, in the year 1900. At all times since then, he has been such attorney, maintaining his residence in Seattle, in this state. Mrs. Williams has been,.at all times since the year. 1919, main taining her residence in Seattle, in this state. On January 12,1921, Kienstra, acting as attorney for Mrs. Williams, procured, in the superior court for King county, a decree of divorce for her from her husband, who was then, and has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. FennWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Knoll v. KnollWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Pierce v. PierceWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Peerless Pacific Co. v. BurckhardWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fisch v. MarlerWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. In Re KienstraWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. In re the Disbarment of KienstraWashington Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API