Legal Opinion
McDonald v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis R'y Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1896No. 17,778PublishedCited by 40 opinions
From the Elkhart Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.
Appellant brought this action against appellee under section 266, R. S. 1881 (section 267, R. S. 1894), to recover damages for the death of a minor, alleging in his complaint that said deceased was his son.
Appellee filed an answer, alleging in substance, that the deceased was a bastard, begotten and born out of wedlock, and that appellant never married the mother of said deceased and never adopted him by the order of any court. A demurrer for want of facts to this answer was overruled.
To this answer appellant filed a reply, alleging in substance that the allegations of said answer are *460true,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marshall v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Simmons v. BullSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
- Blacklaws v. MilneIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Good v. TownsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883
- Lytton v. BairdIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by40 opinions
- Lynch v. KnoopSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Watson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Brisbin v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Murrell v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- S.M v. v. LittlepageIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.