Legal Opinion
Par 3, Inc. v. Livingston
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided September 10, 2004No. S-03-494, S-03-495PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
NATURE OF CASE
The appellants, Par 3, Inc., and Comhusker Nursery, Inc. (Comhusker), each brought suit against Dan Livingston for breach of contract. The actions were subsequently consolidated for trial. The Douglas County District Court found that Livingston was not personally liable for breach of the contract and, accordingly, dismissed Par 3’s and Comhusker’s petitions.
FACTS
In April 1995, Livingston and an associate organized a corporation called Castle Development, Inc. Livingston acted as president of Castle Development. One of the corporation’s proposed projects was a real estate and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carlson v. OkerstromNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Sack Bros. v. Tri-Valley Cooperative, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Anderson Excavating & Wrecking Co. v. Sanitary Improvement District No. 177Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Twin Towers Development, Inc. v. Butternut Apartments, L.P.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. Controlled Air, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Aon Consulting v. Midlands FinancialNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Bloedorn Lumber Co. of N. Platte, Corp. v. NielsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Security National Bank v. RickertNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- Bloedorn Lumber Co. v. NielsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.