Charles W. Heffelman v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Department of Interior of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID T. LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
The primary question here presented is whether jurisdiction exists under section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 1009, to permit judicial review of a decision of the Secretary of the Interior determining heirship to the restricted estate of an Indian. The district court dismissed the action for lack of jurisdiction and this appeal followed.
Appellant is a claimant to part of the restricted estate of Louise Wilson, an unallotted Quapaw Indian who died testate on June 16, 1962. Decedent, under the terms of a will executed with the approval of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schilling v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Everett Foster v. Fred A. Seaton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Blanset v. CardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- First Moon v. White TailSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tooahnippah v. HickelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Paul Harvey, Grace Ernest and Lalo Enriquez v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Willis Attocknie v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- High Horse v. TateCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Carr v. AndrusDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.