Carr v. Andrus
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
This is an action brought by Plaintiff under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706, for judicial review of the final administrative decision of the Defendant Secretary of the Interior concerning the determination of the heirs of a restricted Indian, Tim Tieyah (hereinafter “decedent”). It is asserted that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331(a). A hearing was held on October 1, 1980 in this case to determine whether this Court had subject matter jurisdiction.
From the administrative record before the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tooahnippah v. HickelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Willis Attocknie v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Charles W. Heffelman v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Department of Interior of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
3Cited by1 opinion
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Criterion Wealth Management Insurance Services, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2022