Legal Opinion

Carr v. Andrus

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided October 10, 1980No. CIV-79-1300-DPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.

This is an action brought by Plaintiff under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706, for judicial review of the final administrative decision of the Defendant Secretary of the Interior concerning the determination of the heirs of a restricted Indian, Tim Tieyah (hereinafter “decedent”). It is asserted that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331(a). A hearing was held on October 1, 1980 in this case to determine whether this Court had subject matter jurisdiction.

From the administrative record before the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tooahnippah v. HickelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Willis Attocknie v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  3. Charles W. Heffelman v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Department of Interior of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Criterion Wealth Management Insurance Services, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API