Legal Opinion
High Horse v. Tate
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 3, 1969No. Nos. 9979, 9980PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
This litigation originated with the filing of a complaint in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma by the appellees in the two consolidated appeals before us. The action sought judicial review of the orders of the Secretary of the Interior and his subordinates. Jurisdiction was invoked under the Administrative Procedure Act and 28 U.S.C. § 1391. The trial court took jurisdiction under § 1391, sustained a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the plaintiffs, appellees here, and reversed the order of the Secretary and his subordinates.
The basic facts are without…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Willis Attocknie v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Charles W. Heffelman v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Department of Interior of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tooahnippah v. HickelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Crawford v. AndrusDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1979
- Dorita High Horse v. James Tooahimpah Tate, Frankie Lee Tooahnippah, Vila Tooahnippah and Julia Tooahnippah (Goombi), Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, Department of Interior of the United States of America v. James Tooahimpah Tate, Frankie Lee Tooahnippah, Vila Tooahnippah and Julia Tooahnippah (Goombi)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Tooahnippah v. HickelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970