Legal Opinion
State Bank of Parsons, Kansas v. Elliott
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 3, 1968No. 41681PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
Plaintiff in error, herein called the Bank, sued to recover upon three promissory notes executed by defendant corporation, and allegedly supported by a guaranty contract executed by defendant Elliott. Judgment was entered upon a jury verdict in defendant Elliott’s favor as to two notes, and against him upon the third note. Matters hereafter summarized reflect the factual background which resulted in this appeal upon the original record.
After alleging the Bank’s corporate existence and principal place of business in Parsons, Kansas, the petition set forth four causes of action.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Key Et Ux. v. British American Oil Producing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Gold Kist Peanut Growers Association v. WaldmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Dickerson v. WaldoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- First Nat. Bank Trust Co. of Tulsa v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
3Cited by5 opinions
- James v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- P.E.A.C.E. Corp. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- First National Bank & Trust Co. of El Reno v. StinchcombCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
- Parks v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- James v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991