Legal Opinion

James v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 16, 1991No. 66610PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

Iris James (James), plaintiff below, appeals from an adverse judgment in her fraud action filed against Clarence Zitter-kob and Frank Green, individually-named appellees, and the collective State Farm Companies (State Farm). James appeals asserting error by the trial court in rulings concerning the admission of evidence and jury instructions. Because we find no reversible error in the trial court’s rulings, we AFFIRM the judgment of the trial court.

James, a resident of Sapulpa, Oklahoma, heard that State Farm was interested in training a qualified individual to become one of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chaney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Woodall v. Chandler Material Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Chaney v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Portland Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Bernstein, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
  5. Jordan v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Okland Oil Company v. Conoco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. State v. SugarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  3. Cities Service Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. HILL v. AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  5. Beshara v. Southern National BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API