Legal Opinion
Pumpco, Inc. v. Schenker International, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided December 18, 2001No. 00-M-2422PublishedCited by 158 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BOLAND, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before me on the plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (the “Motion to Amend”), filed November 27, 2001. The plaintiff seeks leave to add a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against Schenker Int’l, Inc. (“Schenker”); and claims for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and deceptive trade practices against Daewoo Heavy Industries, Ltd. (“Daewoo”). Schenker does not oppose the Motion to Amend. Daewoo does oppose the motion, arguing that it should be denied because the plaintiff is guilty of undue delay in seeking…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robert H. E. Frank, Jerry D. Mooberry, Tyrone G. Moreno v. U.S. West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Colorado Visionary Academy v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2000
- Dilmar Oil Co., Inc. v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1997
- Command Communications, Inc. v. Fritz CompaniesColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
3Cited by158 opinions
- Gorsuch, Ltd., B.C. v. Wells Fargo National Bank Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Husky Ventures, Inc. v. B55 Invs., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Lyon v. U.S. Immigration & Customs EnforcementDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Transamerica Life Insurance v. Lincoln National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008
- Perez v. Denver Fire DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2017
153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.