Legal Opinion

In Re Kristovich

California Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1976No. L.A. 30578PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT

In this proceeding we review the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for three years upon conditions of probation, including actual suspension for three months, because of conduct resulting in a conviction for perjury.

Petitioner, who was admitted to the practice of law in California in 1938, has no prior record of discipline. On July 24, 1972, he was convicted of two counts each of perjury (Pen. Code, §§ 118 and 118a) and the preparation of false documentary evidence (Pen. Code, § 134). Following…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Segretti v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re RothrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State Bar of Nevada v. ClaiborneNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Codiga v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In Re StrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Brookman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API