Legal Opinion

Brookman v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1988No. S005340PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

The Review Department of the State Bar of California has recommended that petitioner be suspended from law practice for five years, which term would be stayed during seven years of supervised probation. Recommended conditions of probation include ninety days’ actual suspension, restitution to two former clients and to the State Bar Client Security Fund (to cover amounts paid out to a third former client), and notification of petitioner’s suspension to his clients (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 955(a), (c)).

Petitioner generally consents to the discipline as “appropriate and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Grimes v. HoschlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Inniss v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Coppock v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Kent v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Matter of LevineArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hippard v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Lenore Albert-Sheridan v. State Bar of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. Kwasnik v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. In Re BorowskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API