Presto v. Sequoia Systems, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
This case arises out of an alleged breach of an employment contract. Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The plaintiff, Charles A. Presto (“Presto”), alleges that the defendant Sequoia Systems, Inc. (“Sequoia”): (1) breached the employment contract between Sequoia and Presto (Count I); (2) made false representations to Presto so as to induce him to accept employment with Sequoia, thereby causing Presto to rely on these misrepresentations and causing him injury (Counts II and III); (3) breached an implied contractual covenant of good faith and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Agis v. Howard Johnson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Gram v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Cochran v. Quest Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Hinchey v. Nynex Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Legoff v. Trustees of Boston UniversityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Aware, Inc. v. CENTILLIUM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.