Legal Opinion

State v. Sikhaolouanglath

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided October 17, 1996No. 96-74-C.APublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on October 9,1996, pursuant to an order that directed the defendant, Leothong Sikhaolouanglath, to show cause why the issues raised in his appeal should not be summarily decided. The defendant appealed from a Superior Court finding that the defendant had violated the terms of his probation. In consequence thereof, the trial justice removed the suspension of the defendant’s sentence and ordered him to serve 32 months in prison. The defendant appealed on the basis first, that the trial justice erred in denying his motion to dismiss…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. BourdeauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  3. In Re LamarineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SylviaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  2. State v. RiouxSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  3. State v. WaiteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  4. State v. KennedySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API