Legal Opinion

State v. Parry

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1920No. 2395PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Luna County; Ryan, Judge. Emil Parry was convicted of unlawfully billing neat-cattle belonging to another, arid he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT.

PARKER, C. J.

The appellant, Emil Parry, was in-dieted under section 1613, Code 1915, for the crime of unlawfully and knowingly killing one head of neat cattle, the property of another, and was convicted and sentenced to a term in the penitentiary, from which judgment this appeal is taken.

There was pending at that time two other cases in which the) appellant was jointly indicted with others for the larceny of neat cattle. All three of these cases were set at the same time for trial on the same day. They were numbered respectively 896, 897, and 898; the last numbered case…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wisdom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
  2. Filson v. the Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  3. Carroll v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Johns v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. BjelkstromSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ComptonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State v. KellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. McKinleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State v. OntiverosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. People v. RamírezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API