Legal Opinion

Wisdom v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 20, 1901No. 2187PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Hunt. Tried below before Hon. L. A. Clark. Appeal from a conviction of burglary; penalty, two years imprisonment in the penitentiary. Ho detailed statement of the case is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

The indictment charged the burglarious entry of a storehouse of Frost & Campbell, with intent to commit theft, without the consent of both as to the taking of property. On the trial the State proved the want of consent of Campbell to the taking of the property, but did not prove the want of consent of Frost. This is urged as a ground for reversal. Campbell and Frost testified; Campbell fully as to his want of consent to the taking of the goods, but Frost…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Bedell v. HerringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. People v. NortheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Wilson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  5. State v. MoranOregon Supreme Court · 1887

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Manning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Stern v. State Ex Rel. AnselCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Huntress v. State Ex Rel. ToddCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API