Legal Opinion
Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. California
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 28, 2018No. Case No. 16-cv-01713-BAS-JMAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
(1) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 37);(2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 36); AND(3) DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 54(b)
Hon. Cynthia Bashant, United States District Judge
OVERVIEW
This action stems from an effort to negotiate a new tribal-state gaming compact under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. The Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation ("Pauma" or "Tribe") seeks to offer new forms of gambling at its casino in Northern San Diego County. To make this possible, the Tribe entered into compact…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hastings v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Houston Casualty Company v. Cibus US LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021