Legal Opinion

United States v. US Board of Water Comm'r

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 22, 2018No. 15-16316PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-16316 Plaintiff, D.C. No. WALKER RIVER PAIUTE TRIBE, 3:73-cv-00125- Intervenor-Plaintiff, RCJ-WGC NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION, Petitioner, MINERAL COUNTY, Intervenor-Plaintiff, and NEVADA STATE ENGINEER, Respondent-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS, Participant-Appellee, BACKTRACK, LLC; BALE COUNTER, INC.; GARY M. BERRINGTON; BERRINGTON CUSTOM HAY HAULING & TRANS., INC.; DAMIAN, LTD.; PETER A. FENILI; GDA 2 NEV. STATE ENG’R V. U.S. BD. OF WATER COMM’RS DEGREE,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mineral County v. Walker River Irrigation Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. MINERAL CO. VS. LYON CO. (NRAP 5)Nevada Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State of Alaska v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API